COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dept. of Environmental Protection
Commonwealth News Bureau
Room 308, Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
11/1/2005

CONTACT:
Kurt M. Knaus
Phone: 717-787-1323

DEP'S LANDFILL PERMITTING REGULATIONS UPHELD BY PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT
Regulations Require Social, Economic Benefits to Clearly Outweigh Environmental Harms

HARRISBURG -- The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has upheld Department of Environmental Protection regulations that require landfill operators to show proposed landfill construction or expansion will generate social and economic benefits that clearly outweigh potential environmental harms.

"The Supreme Court's decision is huge win for the people of Pennsylvania," DEP Secretary Kathleen A. McGinty said. "The harms-benefits test gives residents a voice in the permitting process and ensures their communities will garner benefits when they host landfills. These regulations give the state important flexibility and discretion in how to protect the health, safety and welfare of our citizens."

During the permitting process, a harms-benefits test looks at the balance between the impact of a landfill on the surrounding communities and any environmental, social and economic benefits gained from a proposed facility. The analysis is the initial screening mechanism for landfill permit reviews conducted before a full technical review.

The harms-benefits test is described in regulations for municipal waste landfills and residual waste landfills. The regulations went into effect in 2000 and 2001, respectively.

Two landfill operators, Eagle Environmental II LP and Tri-County Industries Inc., had argued that the harms-benefits test was beyond the authority of the Solid Waste Management Act and the Municipal Waste Management Planning, Recycling and Waste Reduction Act. They also argued that requiring benefits to outweigh environmental harms was unconstitutionally vague and beyond the state's police powers.

In rejecting these arguments, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday, Oct. 27, held the following:

• Consideration of economic and social harms and benefits is within the authority of the acts.
• The concept of a balancing test is common and practiced by businesses everyday and the concepts of harms and benefits are easily understood.
• In keeping with the state's police powers, a determination of a project's inherent harms and benefits is reasonably necessary in order to determine whether a potentially dangerous project should be granted a permit in a heavily regulated industry.

DEP's regulations previously had been upheld by the Environmental Hearing Board and Commonwealth Court.

For more information, DEP's Web site at www.depweb.state.pa.us, Keyword: "Waste Management."

This site contains PDF file downloads. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, you may download a free version here.

©2005 People Protecting Communities • last updated Nov 6, 2005
This site has been developed, designed and maintained with 100% volunteer work. No funds are used.
Please report problems to our volunteer WebHead, TechieR